top of page
Search

The Excitement of excavation

  • alisonbeach2
  • 2 days ago
  • 2 min read

Ava Anthony (MAFS 2026; Student at Franklin and Marshall College)


 The most exciting aspect of field school, to me, is actually being in the field. While I enjoy lectures and field trips, these cannot compare to the experience of opening up your trench. At the end of week 3, my trench, Trench 18, opened up a new section on the western side. It brought me back to my first day on site, when we removed the sod and carefully started excavating Context 002. Every stone was exciting, and I gleefully counted the poor worms that were disturbed along the way.



Me with my first piece of medieval pottery
Me with my first piece of medieval pottery

My delight at worms and rocks has not completely waned, but has tempered down a healthy amount. Worms are still counted but hurriedly thrown into the grass. Rocks are looked at with a more careful eye, an eye that now knows to look for nail holes in slate and worked edges in red sandstone. Opening up a new section of the trench made me realize just how much I had learned in the past few weeks.


In particular, Trench 18 has helped me realize what an impact the actions of the Victorians had at the site. In archaeology, you call layers of material contexts, with the sod being the first context. Our second context was a layer of dirt, with mostly rocks with some animal bones and pottery interspersed. The third was a thick layer of rubble. Mostly rock, but with a lot of oyster shells and animal bones. It also had pottery, medieval, victorian, and modern. Then, a layer of clay, and finally, our lowest layer, another layer of rubble. We hoped, with this being the lowest, and therefore oldest, layer, that it would be only medieval. Unfortunately, our trench supervisor, Professor BH, found a shard of victorian transferware in the context.

Our Stratigraphy! You can see clearly the first layer of rubble in this photo
Our Stratigraphy! You can see clearly the first layer of rubble in this photo

 The reason why we don’t want to see anything Victorian is because we want to excavate in undisturbed layers. The deposit of rubble that the victorian shard was in means that the last people to see that layer were the Victorians, and while the Victorian era is interesting in its own right, we are interested in the medieval monastic history of the site. Anything medieval in that layer was messed with by the Victorians, which makes it less compelling than something that is untouched. Although this is disappointing, it means we can get through context 5 and into the next layer, which I hope will be medieval. Our new section will also have to be brought down as well, which we hope will reveal a medieval wall.


Me with the photo setup for when we discovered context 003. We have a meter stick, a north arrow, and a label for the context number. Splitting the trench is called a sondage! Photos credit to Professor BH.
Me with the photo setup for when we discovered context 003. We have a meter stick, a north arrow, and a label for the context number. Splitting the trench is called a sondage! Photos credit to Professor BH.

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
Connections across the Generations

Yv Scarlett Maciel (MAFS 2026; North Carolina State University alumna) Before coming to the University of St Andrews, I thought this program would simply teach me how to excavate an archaeological sit

 
 
 
Looking down...and Looking up

Linday Kalb (MAFS 2026; Student at Brandeis University) Before this summer, I barely understood archaeology. I had read the program, learned quick terminology, and prepared to sit through lectures on

 
 
 

Comments


Express interest in our 2027 University of St Andrews courses in Archaeology and Bioarchaeology!
bottom of page